8

I just got a suggested edit that added the tag to a question where I had included the tag. As of right now, has one question in it and has two.

These seem... kinda redundant to me; why do we have both? Which should we use primarily?

  • Does this need a meta post? With so few questions, you could just make edits to uniformise (like I've been editing to remove the tolkien tag). – Rand al'Thor Feb 6 '18 at 21:21
  • 2
    @Randal'Thor - A meta post will determine which is better and which will be kept. – Mithical Feb 6 '18 at 21:22
  • The Klingon Tag should be a synonym of Klingon-Language. Or the other way around. – user46 Feb 7 '18 at 15:10
13

Being a site dedicated to languages, I think the idea of adding to the end of a tag is unnecessary.

should be merged into .

I could see a potential for a tag such as , as that's distinct from the language itself, but even that is a stretch and should probably be wrapped under

0

Obviously we don't need both, since questions about Klingons or Klingon culture excluding language presumably won't be on-topic here.

However, to make it clear that the tag is only about the Klingon language and not anything else to do with Klingons, I suggest using as the primary tag name.

  • (I was going to post an answer supporting klingon as the master too, for easier voting, but corsiKa beat me to it.) – Rand al'Thor Feb 6 '18 at 21:25

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .